“If ISAF abandoned Helmand and a few thousand Marines moved to Kandahar to clear, hold and build (with Karzai’s kleptocracy?) the Hell out of that province in 2009, are we to believe that the Taliban would’ve just surrendered? They wouldn’t have hit softer targets of the Karzai government, like the Afghan Security Forces? They wouldn’t have moved in the supposedly “cleared” areas around Kabul and set up shop to continuously destabilize the capital in front of TV cameras? That they wouldn’t have relied on safe Pakistani enclaves to rest, recuperate and rotate back for the next three years?”
Prine’s post is worth a read, and it hits specifically at the same frustration Foust expressed in Exum vs Exum: the plan from on high was a bad one, and fault lies not in the execution but the overall structure.
Ultimately, Afghanistan may be a lesson in gradual failure leading to fewer changes than catastrophe. There will be other lessons, but as the Afghan postmortems/terminal diagnoses trickle in, a consistent preference for course adjustment over change in strategy seems has led us to no Tet but instead death from a thousand lost turning points.